Kadir Has University shall host an International Law of the Sea Summer Academy, 22 July-8 August 2024, Istanbul (Türkiye). For more information see here.
Monthly Archives: May 2024
Vacancy: Registrar of ITLOS
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) is currently advertising a vacancy for the Registrar. Expressions of interest should be sent by e-mail to the President of the Tribunal by 21 August 2024. For more information see the announcement and Rules of the Tribunal.
Filed under Vacancies
Summer School: EULoS 2024
The tenth edition of the EULoS Summer School, European Union and the Law of the Sea, will be held 26 August – 6 September 2024, in Genoa, Italy. Applications are welcome on a rolling basis. For more information see the EULoS website.
Filed under Courses
ITLOS: Advisory Opinion Delivered in Request Submitted by COSIS
On 21 May 2024, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) delivered its Advisory Opinion on the Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal). The operative clause provides:
For these reasons,
Advisory Opinion on Request of COSIS, para 441.
THE TRIBUNAL,
(1) Unanimously
Decides that it has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested by the Commission.
(2) Unanimously
Decides to respond to the request for an advisory opinion submitted by the Commission.
(3) Unanimously
Replies to Question (a) as follows:
(a) Anthropogenic GHG emissions into the atmosphere constitute pollution of the marine environment within the meaning of article 1, paragraph 1, subparagraph 4, of the Convention.
(b) Under article 194, paragraph 1, of the Convention, States Parties to the Convention have the specific obligations to take all necessary measures to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions and to endeavour to harmonize their policies in this connection. Such measures should be determined objectively, taking into account, inter alia, the best available science and relevant international rules and standards contained in climate change treaties such as the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement, in particular the global temperature goal of limiting the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and the timeline for emission pathways to achieve that goal. The scope and content of necessary measures may vary in accordance with the means available to States Parties and their capabilities. The necessary measures include, in particular, those to reduce GHG emissions.
(c) The obligation under article 194, paragraph 1, of the Convention to take all necessary measures to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions is one of due diligence. The standard of due diligence is stringent, given the high risks of serious and irreversible harm to the marine environment from such emissions. However, the implementation of the obligation of due diligence may vary according to States’ capabilities and available resources.
(d) Under article 194, paragraph 2, of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to take all measures necessary to ensure that anthropogenic GHG emissions under their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage by pollution to other States and their environment, and that pollution from such emissions under their jurisdiction or control does not spread beyond the areas where they exercise sovereign rights. This obligation applies to a transboundary setting and is a particular obligation in addition to the obligation under article 194, paragraph 1. It is also an obligation of due diligence. The standard of due diligence under article 194, paragraph 2, can be even more stringent than that under article 194, paragraph 1, because of the nature of transboundary pollution.
(e) In terms of specific sources of pollution, marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions can be characterized as pollution from land-based sources, pollution from vessels, or pollution from or through the atmosphere.
(f) Under articles 207 and 212 of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from GHG emissions from land-based sources and from or through the atmosphere, respectively, taking into account internationally agreed rules, standards and recommended practices and procedures contained, inter alia, in climate change treaties such as the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement. To this effect, States Parties have the specific obligations to take other necessary measures and, acting especially through competent international organizations or diplomatic conference, to endeavour to establish global and regional rules, standards and recommended practices and procedures.
(g) Under article 211 of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from GHG emissions from vessels flying their flag or of their registry, which must at least have the same effect as that of generally accepted international rules and standards established through the competent international organization or general diplomatic conference.
(h) Under articles 213 and 222 of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to enforce their national laws and regulations and to adopt laws and regulations and take other measures necessary to implement applicable international rules and standards established through competent international organizations or diplomatic conference to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment from anthropogenic GHG emissions from land-based sources and from or through the atmosphere, respectively.
(i) Under article 217 of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to ensure compliance by vessels flying their flag or of their registry with applicable international rules and standards established through the competent international organization or general diplomatic conference and with their laws and regulations for the prevention, reduction and control of marine pollution from GHG emissions from vessels. To this end, they shall adopt laws and regulations and take other measures necessary for their implementation.
(j) Articles 197, 200 and 201, read together with articles 194 and 192 of the Convention, impose specific obligations on States Parties to cooperate, directly or through competent international organizations, continuously, meaningfully and in good faith, in order to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions. Under article 197, States Parties have the specific obligation to cooperate in formulating and elaborating rules, standards and recommended practices and procedures, consistent with the Convention and based on available scientific knowledge, to counter marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions. Under article 200, States Parties have the specific obligations to cooperate to promote studies, undertake scientific research and encourage the exchange of information and data on marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions, its pathways, risks and remedies, including mitigation and adaptation measures. Under article 201, States Parties have the specific obligation to establish appropriate scientific criteria on the basis of which rules, standards and recommended practices and procedures are to be formulated and elaborated to counter marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions.
(k) Under article 202 of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to assist developing States, in particular vulnerable developing States, in their efforts to address marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions. This article provides for the obligation of appropriate assistance, directly or through competent international organizations, in terms of capacity-building, scientific expertise, technology transfer and other matters. Article 203 reinforces the support to developing States, in particular those vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change, by granting them preferential treatment in funding, technical assistance and pertinent specialized services from international organizations.
(l) Articles 204, 205 and 206 of the Convention impose on States Parties specific obligations of monitoring, publishing the reports thereof and conducting environmental impact assessments as a means to address marine pollution from anthropogenic GHG emissions. Under article 204, paragraph 1, States Parties have the specific obligation to endeavour to observe, measure, evaluate and analyse the risks or effects of pollution of the marine environment from anthropogenic GHG emissions. Under article 204, paragraph 2, States Parties have the specific obligation to keep under continuing surveillance the effects of activities they have permitted, or in which they are engaged, in order to determine whether such activities are likely to pollute the marine environment through anthropogenic GHG emissions. Under article 205, States Parties have the specific obligation to publish the results obtained from monitoring the risks or effects of pollution from such emissions or to communicate them to the competent international organizations for their dissemination. Under article 206, States Parties have the specific obligation to conduct environmental impact assessments. Any planned activity, either public or private, which may cause substantial pollution to the marine environment or significant and harmful changes thereto through anthropogenic GHG emissions, including cumulative effects, shall be subjected to an environmental impact assessment. Such assessment shall be conducted by the State Party under whose jurisdiction or control the planned activity will be undertaken with a view to mitigating and adapting to the adverse effects of such emissions on the marine environment. The result of such assessment shall be reported in accordance with article 205 of the Convention.
(4) Unanimously
Replies to Question (b) as follows:
(a) The Tribunal’s response to Question (a) is relevant to its response to Question (b). Subparagraphs (j), (k) and (l) of operative paragraph (3) are of particular relevance in this regard.
(b) The obligation under article 192 of the Convention to protect and preserve the marine environment has a broad scope, encompassing any type of harm or threat to the marine environment. Under this provision, States Parties have the specific obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment from climate change impacts and ocean acidification. Where the marine environment has been degraded, this obligation may call for measures to restore marine habitats and ecosystems. Article 192 of the Convention requires States Parties to anticipate risks relating to climate change impacts and ocean acidification, depending on the circumstances.
(c) This obligation is one of due diligence. The standard of due diligence is stringent, given the high risks of serious and irreversible harm to the marine environment from climate change impacts and ocean acidification.
(d) Under article 194, paragraph 5, of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to protect and preserve rare or fragile ecosystems as well as the habitat of depleted, threatened or endangered species and other forms of marine life from climate change impacts and ocean acidification.
(e) Under articles 61 and 119 of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligations to take measures necessary to conserve the living marine resources threatened by climate change impacts and ocean acidification. In taking such measures, States Parties shall take into account, inter alia, the best available science and relevant environmental and economic factors. This obligation requires the application of the precautionary approach and an ecosystem approach.
(f) The obligation to seek to agree under article 63, paragraph 1, and the obligation to cooperate under article 64, paragraph 1, of the Convention, require States Parties, inter alia, to consult with one another in good faith with a view to adopting effective measures necessary to coordinate and ensure the conservation and development of shared stocks. The necessary measures on which consultations are required must take into account the impacts of climate change and ocean acidification on living marine resources. Under article 118 of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to cooperate in taking measures necessary for the conservation of living marine resources in the high seas that are threatened by climate change impacts and ocean acidification.
(g) Under article 196 of the Convention, States Parties have the specific obligation to take appropriate measures to prevent, reduce and control pollution from the introduction of non-indigenous species due to the effects of climate change and ocean acidification which may cause significant and harmful changes to the marine environment. This obligation requires the application of the precautionary approach.
Judges Jesus, Pawlak, Kulyk, Kittichaisaree and Infante Caffi availed themselves of the right to attach individual Declarations to the Advisory Opinion of the Tribunal.
Filed under Jurisprudence
Seminar: Access to the Sea and an Ethiopia-Somaliland Port Deal
The International Centre of the Horn of Africa (ICHA) and the Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, will host a seminar, entitled, Access to the Sea and an Ethiopia-Somaliland Port Deal: Legal, Economic, Political and Security Issues, 21 May 2024, online. See here.
Filed under Events
Further Expanded North Sea MoU on Cooperation Regarding the International Operation of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)
On 10 May 2024, Norway joined the UK, Belgium, Denmark, and the Netherlands in an expanded MoU on Cooperation Regarding the International Operation of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships MASS, which supersedes a previous MoU on Cooperation Regarding the International Operation of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships MASS signed by the UK, Belgium, Denmark, and the Netherlands (i.e. without Norway) on 27 November 2023 – itself superseding a smaller MoU (i.e. without the Netherlands) signed on 13 September 2023. The 2024 edition of the MoU is not currently available, but no reported differences from the 2023 MoUs (beyond the expanded Signatories) are reported in the press release. The MoU provides “[t]he current Signatories of this Memorandum, after due diligence and agreement, would welcome other North Sea countries to join as new Signatories”.
The MoU is “intended to encourage and facilitate collaboration between the Signatories on the international operations of MASS and other autonomous vessels, including non-SOLAS size MASS in the North Sea”. The context explicitly notes that the MoU is to foster opportunities to safely support open-sea operation, tests and trials of MASS in different maritime environments, including the EEZ and on the high seas.
Filed under State Practice
Call for Abstracts: New Maritime Technologies – Challenges & Opportunities
On occasion of the 2024 ESIL Annual Conference (5-6 September 2024), the ESIL Interest Group on the Law of the Sea will convene a workshop, entitled, New Maritime Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities, 4 September 2024 (Vilnius, Lithuania). Abstracts are welcome until 20 May 2024. For more information see the call.
Vacancy: Postdoctoral Fellow at University of Bergen
The Faculty of Law at the University of Bergen (UiB) is currently seeking a Shaping European Research Leaders for Marine Sustainability (SEAS) postdoctoral fellow in regulatory and governance challenges to ocean sustainability (fixed-term 3-years/full time). Applications are welcome until 10 June 2024. For more information see here.
Filed under Vacancies
Vacancy: PhD position at University of Groningen
The Arctic Centre at the University of Groningen is currently advertising a fully-funded PhD position on the Legal Aspects of Indigenous Subsistence Harvesting in the Arctic. Applications are welcome before 9 May 2024. For more information see here.
Filed under Vacancies
Norway: MoUs on Cross-Border Transportation of CO2 with the Purpose of Permanent Geological Storage
Following previous relevant arrangements on the international transport and storage of carbon (e.g. 2022 Belgium-Denmark MoU), on 15 April 2024 Norway signed a series of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with neighbouring States on Cross-Border Transportation of CO2 with the Purpose of Permanent Geological Storage:
- Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Between the Minister for Environment of the Flemish Region and The Federal Minister for the North Sea of Belgium and the Minister for Energy and Climate of the Walloon Region and the Minister of Energy of Norway on Cross-Border Transportation of CO2 with the Purpose of Permanent Geological Storage.
- Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Between the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities of Denmark and the Ministry of Energy of Norway on Cross-Border Transportation of CO2 with the Purpose of Permanent Geological Storage.
- Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Between the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy of the Netherlands and the Ministry of Energy of Norway on Cross-Border Transportation of CO2 with the Purpose of Permanent Geological Storage.
- Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Between the Ministry of Climate and the Environment [sic] in Sweden and the Ministry of Energy of Norway on Cross-Border Transportation of CO2 with the Purpose of Permanent Geological Storage.
Denmark and Sweden also signed a similar bilateral arrangement:
- Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Between the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities of Denmark and the Ministry of Climate and the Enterprise in Sweden on Cross-Border Transportation of CO2 with the Purpose of Permanent Geological Storage.
The MoUs represent State practice on arrangements in the sense of London Protocol, Article 6(2), as amended by Resolution LP. 3(4) (2009) (not in force) and provisional application thereof under Resolution LP.5(14) (2019). As required, all states have previously deposited a declaration on provisional application of the 2009 amendment of the London Protocol pending its entry into force. In related news, Norway had announced two areas in the North Sea for applications related to CO2 injection and storage on the Norwegian continental shelf. “The Ministry will now process the applications received and aims to award exploration licenses in the second half of 2024”.
Filed under State Practice
Vacancy: Doctoral Fellow at Ghent University
The Maritime Institute (Department of European, Public and International Law of the Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University (Belgium)) is seeking a doctoral fellow to address, Gentle wave or tsunami? The impact of unmanned and autonomous shipping on the law of the sea. Applications are welcome until 14 June 2024. For more information see here.
Filed under Vacancies
Philippine International Law of the Sea Academy (2024)
The 2024 Session of the Philippine International Law of the Sea Academy (PHILSEA) is open for applications until Sunday, 2 June 2024 . PHILSEA 2024 is an intensive academic capacity-building training programme to be held from 12-27 July 2024 that aims to strengthen the intellectual and practical aptitude of Filipinos (with limited slots for Non-Filipinos) on the law of the sea. It comprises 26 training lectures, a case study, and a navigation workshop. The initiative is endorsed by and in partnership with the Legal Education Board of the Philippines, the Philippine Association of Law Schools, and the Association of Law Students of the Philippines. See further here.
Filed under Courses
Call for Papers: Law of the Sea in the ASEAN Maritime Domain
The Max Planck Foundation for International Peace and the Rule of Law (MPFPR) invites submissions for a special issue on the Law of the Sea in the ASEAN Maritime Domain. The deadline for the submission of abstracts is 20 June 2024. For more information see the announcement and call for papers.
UNGA: Resolution Establishing a Preparatory Commission for the BBNJ Agreement
On 24 April 2024 the UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted Resolution 78/272 ‘Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction’ (currently available as UN Doc A/78/L.41) with a vote (164-2-2; Russia and Syria voting against, Togo and Angola abstaining). Singapore led consultations on the text, which establishes a Preparatory Commission to prepare for the entry into force of the BBNJ Agreement and the convening of the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the BBNJ Agreement.
3. Decides to establish a preparatory commission, which shall meet at United Nations Headquarters unless otherwise decided, on dates to be determined, to prepare for the entry into force of the Agreement and to prepare for the convening of the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Agreement, at the conclusion of which the commission will cease to exist;
UNGA Resolution 78/272
[…]
11. Further decides that the commission shall hold a three-day organizational meeting in the first half of 2024 with full conference services, including documentation, to discuss organizational matters, including the election of the Co-Chairs and a Bureau of the commission consisting of up to 15 members with up to 3 members from each regional group and taking into account gender balance, the dates of the meetings of the commission and the programme of work of the commission;
In a Letter dated 30 June 2023, the President of the Intergovernmental Conference that developed the text of the BBNJ Agreement had previously highlighted “the desire expressed by several delegations that efforts be undertaken with a view to supporting the early entry into force of the Agreement as well as its early implementation, including through a preparatory process such as a preparatory commission” (UN Doc A/77/945, p. 2). The Statement of Singapore on the introduction of the draft resolution provides further useful information on the inspiration and objectives of key elements in the resolution.
The Preparatory Commission is open to all UN Member States, members of the specialized agencies and Parties to UNCLOS (para. 4), with a broad invitation to other qualified entities, organizations and bodies to attend as observers (paras 5-6). The voluntary trust fund for the BBNJ Intergovernmental Conference is extended to the Preparatory Commission to assist developing countries attend meetings.
On decision-making of the Preparatory Commission:
8. Further decides that, after 20 September 2025 or the date of entry into force of the Agreement, whichever comes earlier, the taking of decisions by the commission shall only be by States and regional economic integration organizations that have signed the Agreement or have ratified, approved, accepted or acceded to the Agreement;
UNGA Resolution 78/272
9. Decides that the commission will take decisions on any recommendations to the Conference of Parties to the Agreement at the final meeting of the commission;
A proposed amendment by Russia to remove references to past and future milestones in the BBNJ Agreement, as well as the BBNJ Agreement’s addition as a sub-item to the provisional agenda of the seventy-ninth session of UNGA, was not adopted (UN Doc. A/78/L.43). A proposed amendment by Russia to include a strict sunset clause on the existence of the preparatory commission, as at the latest 20 September 2025, was also not adopted (UN Doc. A/78/L.43; contrast UN Doc. A/78/L.41 para 3 (as adopted)).
Filed under International Organizations, State Practice, Treaties